Health Connector Issues Four Final Rules Implementing Key
Features of the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Act
At its June 5, 2007 meeting, the Massachusetts Health
Insurance Connector Authority (the gConnectorh) issued four final
regulations implementing the following aspects of the Massachusetts Health
Care Reform Act (the gActh)1:
- gEmployer Sponsored Health Insurance Accessh (956 CMR 4.00),
finalizing the Actfs gcafeteria planh requirement;
- gMinimum Creditable Coverageh (956 CMR 5.00), establishing standards
for what constitutes gminimum creditable coverageh for purposes of
satisfying the individual mandate and avoiding the imposition of a tax
penalty;
- gDetermining Affordability for the Individual Mandateh (956 CMR
6.00), prescribing standards under which health insurance is determined
to be not affordable for purposes of exemptions from the Actfs
individual heath insurance mandate; and
- gEligibility and Hearing Process for Commonwealth Careh (956 CMR
3.00), setting the basic rules for Connector access for the purpose of
purchasing Connector-subsidized health insurance coverage.
This Alert summarizes these four final Connector
regulations. For a comprehensive treatment of the Actfs impact on
employers and individuals, click here for a copy of our firmfs publication entitled,
An Employersf Guide to the 2006 Massachusetts Health Care Reform
Act.
Employer Sponsored Health Insurance Access
(956 CMR
4.00)
The Act requires each employer with more than 10
employees in the Commonwealth to gadopt and maintain a cafeteria plan that
satisfies 26 U.S.C. 125 and the rules and regulations promulgated by the
connector.h The provision also requires a copy of the plan to be filed
with the Connector. The Act prescribes an effective date of July 1, 2007
for the cafeteria plan requirement.
On March 20, 2007, the Connector issued an emergency
regulation implementing this requirement. (Click here for a copy of our advisory of March 23, 2007
explaining the emergency cafeteria plan regulation.) Under the emergency
rule, employers with g11 or moreh full-time equivalent employees during a
designated gapplicable determination periodh are subject to the rule.
These employers are referred to as 151F Employers (a reference to the
statute that imposes the cafeteria plan requirement, Massachusetts General
Laws, Chapter 151F). The emergency rulefs gapplicable determination
periodh was either an ginitial testing periodh that began April 1, 2006
and ended March 31, 2007, or a gsubsequent testing period,h which operated
on a July 1st to June 30th fiscal year.
The cafeteria plan requirement can best be explained by
viewing compliance from the perspective of the employee, i.e., the
requirement is satisfied if each Massachusetts employee has access to at
least one gmedial care coverage optionh on a pretax basis. While neither
the emergency nor the final rule defines the term gmedial care coverage
option,h a flexible spending account or a limited scope dental or vision
program will not suffice.
Example
Employer X is subject to the Actfs cafeteria plan
requirement—i.e., X has g11 or more Employees at all locations
within the Commonwealth of Massachusettsh during the applicable testing
period. Employer X provides a single group health insurance arrangement to
its full-time employees, but its does not offer coverage to its part-time
employees. Employer X will satisfy the cafeteria plan requirements if it
adopts a cafeteria plan under which:
- full-time employees may pay their employee premiums
on a pretax basis for the employer-provided coverage, and
- part-time employees can obtain coverage through the
Connector and pay premiums on a pretax basis via payroll deduction.
Note: In most if not all cases, employers will
need to amend their existing cafeteria plans or adopt gConnector-onlyh
cafeteria plans in order to comply with the cafeteria plan requirements
with respect to their part-time employees who are not eligible for
employer-subsidized health insurance coverage.
The emergency rule permitted cafeteria plan waiting
periods within limits, and certain employees were not required to be
covered, e.g., part-time employees who are regularly scheduled to
work fewer than 64 hours per month.
The final cafeteria plan regulation is similar to the
emergency rule, with the following exceptions:
- The cafeteria plan requirement does not apply to
multiemployer health benefit plans. For this purpose, the term
gMultiemployer Health Benefit Planh is defined to mean:
A health benefit plan to which more than one
Employer is required to contribute, which is maintained pursuant to
one or more collective bargaining agreements between one or more
employee organizations and more than one Employer, and there is
evidence that such Employer contributions to the Multiemployer Health
Benefit Plan were the subject of good faith bargaining between such
employee representatives and such Employers.
- The rule includes both an initial measuring period
of April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007, which has not changed from the
emergency rule, and a gsubsequenth measuring period, which has changed.
Under the emergency rule, the subsequent measuring period ran from July
1st to June 30th. The final regulation changes this to October 1st to
September 30th, and the cafeteria plan requirement applies as of the
following January 1st.
- Under the emergency rule, a cafeteria plan could not
impose a waiting period that exceeded the lesser of the waiting period
of the underlying medical plan or 60 days. The final regulation now
permits cafeteria plan waiting periods that match the waiting period of
the underlying medical plan, even where the underlying waiting period
exceeds 60 days.
- Lastly, the final rule clarifies that no cafeteria
plan access is required where the plan pays the entire cost of coverage
for all employees.
Minimum Creditable Coverage (956 CMR 5.00)
The Actfs individual mandate generally requires that
Massachusetts residents age 18 and older obtain and maintain health
insurance, the coverage under which is gminimum creditable coverage,h
provided that such coverage is gaffordable.h If a resident can establish
that he or she does not have access to affordable coverage, he or she can
get an exemption from the individual mandate. The legislature left it up
to the Connector to define what constitutes minimum creditable coverage
and what coverage is deemed affordable.
The final Connector rule establishing criteria for
gminimum creditable coverageh varies little from its March 20, 2007
proposed rule. Under the final regulation, from July 1, 2007 to December
31, 2008, coverage under any fully insured group health plan issued by a
carrier licensed in Massachusetts is automatically deemed to qualify, as
are self-funded plans that provide gmedical, surgical or hospital
benefitsh (e.g., a self-funded mini-med plan). Beginning January 1,
2009, however, only plans meeting certain requirements will constitute
gminimum creditable coverage.h These requirements include strict limits on
co-payments and deductibles as well as mandated prescription drug
coverage.
The final rule also sets out a list of items that do
not rise to the level of minimum creditable coverage, including, among
others, the following:
- accident-only, credit-only, or limited-scope vision
or dental benefits;
- hospital indemnity insurance policies if offered as
independent, non-coordinated benefits (e.g., policies which
provide an in-patient hospitalization benefit not to exceed $500 per
day);
- disability income insurance;
- supplemental liability insurance;
- specified disease insurance;
- insurance arising out of a workersf compensation law
or similar law; and
- automobile medical payment insurance.
Determining Affordability for the
Individual Mandate
(956 CMR 6.00)
On April 11, 2007, the Connector issued a release
entitled gAffordability Standards Recommended to Connector Board,h which
recommends baseline gaffordabilityh requirements. These requirements are
important because, as indicated above, individuals without access to
affordable coverage are not subject to the individual mandate.
With the affordability rule, the Connector has
established a formal process for determining affordability. The Connector
board must vote annually, not later than June 1st of each year, to adopt
an affordability schedule prescribing the percentage of an individualfs
adjusted gross income that the individual can be expected to contribute
toward the cost of health insurance. Public comment is permitted as a part
of the process, and a formal appeals process is also included. Individuals
who demonstrate that no Connector health plans are affordable for them may
seek a certificate that the penalty should not be assessed.
Eligibility and Hearing Process for
Commonwealth Care
(956 CMR 3.00)
The Commonwealth Care Insurance Program provides
eligible, low-income Massachusetts residents access to medical care
through subsidized heath insurance. Commonwealth Care is operated by the
Connector, which has developed four plan types that differ based on income
and payment structure. 956 CMR 3.00 governs the process whereby low-income
individuals can gain access to Commonwealth Care products. Specifically,
the final regulation contains rules governing eligibility for
participation and enrollment in Commonwealth Care, and it establishes
enrollee premium contributions, disenrollment procedures, and a hearings
and appeals process.
1 Chapter 58 of
the Acts of 2006, An Act Providing Access to Affordable, Quality,
Accountable Health Care, as amended by Chapter 324 of the Acts of 2006, An
Act Relative to Health Care Access, and Chapter 450 of the of the Acts of
2006, An Act Further Regulating Health Care Access.
* * * * *
If you have any questions concerning
the information discussed in this advisory or any other employee benefits
topic, please contact one of the attorneys listed below or your primary
contact with the firm who can direct you to the right person. We would be
delighted to work with you.
Alden
Bianchi
617.348.3057 | AJBianchi@mintz.com
Tom Greene
617.348.1886 | TMGreene@mintz.com
Addy Press
617.348.1659 | ACPress@mintz.com
Pamela Fleming
617.348.1664 | PBFleming@mintz.com
Copyright © 2007 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky
and Popeo, P.C.
The above has been sent as a service by the law firm of
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. and may be considered
an advertisement or solicitation. The content enclosed is not intended to
provide legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. The
distribution list is maintained at Mintz Levinfs main office, located at
One Financial Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111. If you no longer wish
to receive electronic mailings from the firm, please notify our marketing
department by going to www.mintz.com/unsubscribe.cfm.